So, for the last few years, it’s like SUVs have taken over the car world like a pop band going viral. Everyone’s digging the high-up seats and the chunky size of these beasts. They make you feel like the king of the road, not to mention the crazy amount of room for your squad and all their gear, making the good ol’ sedan look like a tight pair of jeans after Thanksgiving dinner. With SUVs becoming the main squeeze in the auto scene, there’s been a wild explosion of models on the market. Choosing the right make and model has become as tough as picking a Netflix show on a Saturday night. And let’s not even start on the whole trim level saga鈥攊t’s like trying to find a custom-tailored suit in a world of off-the-rack.
Every car maker under the sun is throwing their hat in the SUV ring, even Ferrari with its Purosangue, because why not? Now, having a bazillion SUVs out there is a double-edged sword. On the bright side, stumbling upon a decent one is pretty much a given, but the headache kicks in when you try to figure out which decent one to actually buy. But hey, as long as you steer clear of the models we’re about to spill the tea on, you’ll be golden. We’re talking about the SUVs that just can’t seem to get it right in the big leagues of reliability, safety, and comfort. So, buckle up鈥攈ere come the Top 5 worst Suvs for 2024 that you’d probably want to avoid.
Related: Top Boxy Suvs 2024
Top Suvs To Avoid 陌n 2024
#1 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport (2023)
Why It鈥檚 One of the Worst: The 2023 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport has earned its place among the worst SUVs due to poor reliability ratings, an outdated interior, and an underpowered engine.
Performance and Reliability:
When you step on the gas, the Outlander Sport feels sluggish. The 2.0-liter engine produces only 148 horsepower, which isn’t enough for quick acceleration or confident highway merging. Consumer Reports has frequently flagged the Outlander Sport for its reliability issues, making it a gamble in terms of long-term ownership.
Interior and Comfort:
Inside, the Outlander Sport shows its age. The design feels several years behind the competition, with cheap materials and an uninspired layout. The infotainment system is clunky and lacks the seamless integration found in rivals. Passengers will also find the rear seats cramped, which isn’t ideal for families or long trips.
Technology and Features:
While it does come with basic safety features, the tech package is minimal. Many competitors offer advanced driver assistance systems and more intuitive infotainment interfaces as standard, leaving the Outlander Sport feeling outdated and under-equipped.
Critical Thoughts:
- Car and Driver: “The Outlander Sport鈥檚 outdated design and lackluster performance make it hard to recommend in a competitive segment.”
- U.S. News & World Report: “Poor reliability and an unrefined interior make the 2023 Mitsubishi Outlander Sport a tough sell against its more modern rivals.”
#2 Jeep Compass (2023)
The 2023 Jeep Compass is let down by subpar reliability, small cargo space, and weak acceleration.
Performance and Reliability:
The Compass looks rugged, but its performance doesn’t live up to the off-road heritage of the Jeep brand. The base engine, a 2.4-liter four-cylinder, is underwhelming. It struggles to provide the necessary power for both city and highway driving. Reliability has been a significant issue, with frequent complaints about mechanical problems.
Interior and Space:
When it comes to interior space, the Compass disappoints. Cargo space is limited, especially when compared to other compact SUVs. This limitation makes it less practical for those who need to haul gear or groceries. Rear passengers will also notice the lack of legroom, making it uncomfortable for longer journeys.
Technology and Features:
Though it offers some modern features, the infotainment system can be glitchy. The small touchscreen and lack of standard advanced safety features leave it trailing behind other models in the same price range.
Critical Thoughts:
- Edmunds: “The 2023 Compass is plagued by reliability issues and a weak powertrain, making it a poor choice in the compact SUV segment.”
- MotorTrend: “Despite its rugged looks, the Compass fails to deliver in terms of performance and practicality.”
#3 Chevrolet Trax (2024)
Why It鈥檚 One of the Worst:
The 2024 Chevrolet Trax suffers from a lack of advanced safety features, a noisy engine, and a cramped interior.
Performance and Engine Noise:
The Trax is powered by a 1.4-liter turbocharged engine that is noisy and unrefined. It struggles to deliver a smooth ride, especially at higher speeds. The noise from the engine can be intrusive, making it less pleasant for long trips.
Interior Space:
Space is a major issue inside the Trax. The rear seats are particularly cramped, which can make it uncomfortable for passengers. The cargo area is also limited, which affects its practicality for daily use or road trips.
Safety and Technology:
Perhaps the most glaring issue is the lack of advanced safety features that are now standard in many competitors. While it does have a basic infotainment system, it lacks the advanced connectivity options and driver assistance features that modern buyers expect.
Critical Thoughts:
- Kelley Blue Book: “The 2024 Trax鈥檚 lack of advanced safety features and cramped interior make it hard to recommend.”
- J.D. Power: “Noisy and underpowered, the Trax struggles to compete with more refined options in the subcompact SUV market.”
#4 Ford EcoSport (2023)
The 2023 Ford EcoSport makes the list due to low fuel efficiency, a small cargo area, and mediocre ride quality.
Fuel Efficiency and Performance:
One would expect a subcompact SUV to be fuel-efficient, but the EcoSport falls short. Its fuel economy is disappointing for the class, making it more expensive to run over time. The engine also feels underpowered, which affects overall driving enjoyment.
Interior and Cargo Space:
The EcoSport鈥檚 interior is cramped. The cargo area is small, limiting its practicality for families or anyone needing to transport larger items. The rear door design, which swings out instead of lifting up, can be cumbersome in tight parking spaces.
Ride Quality:
The ride quality is another area where the EcoSport fails to impress. The suspension struggles with uneven road surfaces, leading to a bumpy and uncomfortable ride. It lacks the refinement found in many of its rivals, making it less appealing for daily commutes or long drives.
Critical Thoughts:
- MotorTrend: “The 2023 EcoSport鈥檚 poor fuel efficiency and cramped interior make it a tough sell.”
- Autotrader: “With its lackluster performance and small cargo space, the EcoSport doesn鈥檛 stand out in the competitive subcompact SUV market.”
#5 2023 Ford Explorer
Often appearing on lists of the worst SUVs to buy 2024, the Ford Explorer has become a problematic choice for consumers. While historically celebrated as an American icon, the recent versions have not lived up to expectations. The latest model, in particular, has drawn significant criticism, especially from a company as esteemed as Ford, known for its longstanding history in the automotive industry. A glaring issue is its predicted reliability score, which is alarmingly low at 1 out of 5, according to Consumer Reports.
Reliability Issues:
The Explorer’s reliability concerns are serious; owners frequently face unexpected breakdowns and stalling鈥攆ar more often than one would anticipate. Many of these vehicles have needed multiple repairs throughout their lifespan, with a persistent oil leak often necessitating recalls. This small but significant defect can escalate, potentially leading to dangerous situations where the engine compartment could catch fire due to the combination of excessive heat and flammable materials
What Will Your Wallet Say?
- Average Yearly Maintenance Costs: Brace yourself for about $732 a year, according to RepairPal.
- First 10 Years Maintenance Estimate: CarEdge says you’re looking at an eye-watering $9,017.
- Recall Rundown: We’ve seen 4 recalls on this bad boy, covering the engine, powertrain, and a double feature on backover prevention.
- A Year to Avoid Like Spoiled Milk: The 2016 Ford Explorer. Between water leaks, paint and trim issues, a moody suspension, rebellious power steering, a drive system with an attitude, a climate system that can’t decide, transmission tantrums, body hardware that’s more like hardware-less, and in-car electronics that forgot how to electron鈥攊t’s a hard pass.
In short, while the Explorer might have once been the go-to family SUV, it’s clear that this generation might just be one to skip if you’re shopping around.
Also Check: Top Most Quiet Cars 2024
#6 2023 Nissan Pathfinder
Nissan threw the design playbook out the window and channeled the spirit of the ’80s and ’90s SUVs, giving the Pathfinder a boxy makeover that stands out in a sea of carbon-copy designs. It’s got handling sharper than a chef’s knife, cutting through curves with barely a wobble. Inside, it might not be the plush palace you’d find in some rivals, but Nissan’s SL package does sprinkle a bit of luxury into the mix for those with a taste for the finer things.
But, here’s where the tune changes鈥攖he reliability score for the 2023 Pathfinder is like a bad note in an otherwise catchy song, hitting a low of 1/5. Owners have been singing the blues about a few things, but the main chorus is about the transmission or drivetrain throwing in the towel and deciding to take a nap at the most inconvenient times. Then, there’s the ensemble of modern woes like glitchy in-car electronics and electrical gremlins that love to play hide and seek. And for some, the Pathfinder’s control screen decides to go on a digital detox, leaving drivers staring at a blank screen.
Now, let’s talk damage to the wallet:
- Avg. Yearly Maintenance Costs: About $542, says RepairPal.
- Estimated Maintenance Tab over the first decade: $7,558, courtesy of CarEdge.
- And, it’s been back to the shop for a callback performance once (seats, take a bow).
If you’re browsing the used SUV market, you might want to skip the 2015 model year of the Pathfinder. It’s like the box set of every issue you don’t want, featuring leaks, a rebellious transmission, and a whole cast of other mechanical divas.
Related: Top 10 Safest Suvs 2024
#7 2023 Kia Sorento
Now, you might be scratching your head, wondering why mid-sized SUVs are popping up on this list like daisies. Well, it’s simple: this segment is hotter than a summer barbecue right now, and automakers are tripping over themselves to get a piece of that juicy market pie. Enter the Kia Sorento, a sleek three-row mid-sizer that’s been jazzed up to stay snazzy on the outside and packed with the latest tech toys on the inside. No matter which engine you pick, it promises a ride smooth enough to make a jazz band jealous, packed with enough grunt to keep things interesting.
But then, the plot thickens, because when it comes to hanging tight on the reliability branch, the Sorento’s grip is a bit… slippery. Scoring a meager 1/5 in the reliability stakes according to the folks at Consumer Reports, it seems the Sorento’s got a bit of stage fright. It stumbles over the forward collision warning and lane departure systems鈥攆eatures that could be lifesavers, but only if you, the star of the show, could actually see the road properly. Yep, Kia’s made that crucial part a tad challenging, throwing a bit of unnecessary drama into your drive.
Let’s talk numbers:
- Avg. Yearly Upkeep Cost? RepairPal pegs it at $533.
- Looking at a 10-year stretch? You might be parting with about $7,953, according to CarEdge.
- And, it’s had to take a bow three times for recalls (backover prevention, equipment, and trailer hitches, no less).
Also Check: Best Suvs 2024 Under 40K
#8 2023 Lincoln Aviator
When considering what are the worst SUVs to buy, many might not immediately think of the Lincoln Aviator. Yet, despite its impressive handling鈥攊t handles corners like it’s on rails, despite its generous proportions鈥攊t’s important to take a holistic view. Pop the hood, and you’re greeted by a turbocharged 3.0-liter V-6 that turns the act of accelerating into a minor act of defiance against physics, shooting from 0 to 60 MPH in just 5.4 seconds. If you’re feeling a bit extra, there are upper trims that add a bit more oomph and torque to the mix. Inside, Lincoln lives up to its reputation with a cabin that’s a haven of leather, wood, and chrome鈥攁 true testament to Ford’s posher sibling’s flair for the finer things.
But, and it’s a big but, the Lincoln Aviator didn’t just land on our list to show off its good looks. Nope, it’s the reliability department where the Aviator starts to lose altitude, with Consumer Reports giving it a shaky 1/5 rating for the year. This isn’t a new tune for the Aviator; it’s had ongoing sagas with the drivetrain and in-car electronics, alongside a Ford family tradition of paint and trim that seem to think they’re in a peel-off contest.
Let’s break down the costs of keeping this beauty flying:
- Avg. Yearly Maintenance Costs: $626, per RepairPal’s figures.
- Buckle up for an Estimated $11,691 in Maintenance over the first 10 years, according to CarEdge.
- The recall list is a bit of a saga too, with 5 callbacks (including a triple feature for backover prevention, a cameo by the powertrain, and a special appearance by seat belts).
#9 2023 GMC Yukon
It’s kinda wild, right? The GMC Yukon is like the celebrity of American streets, rolling around like it owns the place. Despite its paparazzi appeal, it finds itself chilling at a not-so-cool fifth place out of eight in the “SUVs you might wanna think twice about” list for 2023. And, yep, you guessed it鈥攔eliability issues are crashing this party, too. Consumer Reports dished out a rather unimpressive 2/5 predicted reliability score for the Yukon. The twist? This beast comes with a hefty price tag, making any pit stops for repairs feel like you’re funding a small treasure hunt.
Here’s the deal: owning a Yukon means you’ll probably be on a first-name basis with your mechanic and your bank account might start giving you the silent treatment. And because it’s not exactly acing the reliability tests, waving goodbye to your Yukon also means saying hello to some serious depreciation blues. If you’re thinking of buying this ride new, you might want to brace yourself for a double whammy of maintenance costs and value drop. So, the long and short of it? You might want to swipe left on this one.
Let’s talk numbers:
- Avg. Yearly Maintenance Costs: A cool $747, according to RepairPal.
- Estimated Maintenance Costs Over the First Decade: An eye-watering $8,300, courtesy of CarEdge.
- And for the encore, it’s had a callback for an exterior lighting issue.
#10 2024 Mercedes-AMG EQE SUV
The anticipation around driving the 2024 Mercedes-AMG EQE SUV was palpable. Historically, AMGs have masterfully combined exhilarating performance with unparalleled comfort. This reputation set high hopes for a thrilling experience with the new electric SUV.
Performance and Power
True to the AMG spirit, the EQE SUV鈥檚 straight-line acceleration is formidable. The instant torque characteristic of electric vehicles means that this model can indeed deliver thrilling bursts of speed, making faces ripple with the force. However, this once unique trait now seems commonplace among high-powered EVs; it no longer sets the EQE SUV apart in a rapidly evolving market.
Driving Experience Complications
The real twist in the experience comes from an unexpected feature: the brake pedal. This component unpredictably adjusts its position based on the regenerative braking settings, which engage when lifting off the accelerator. This mechanism is intended to help recover energy as the SUV slows down, yet it also introduces a level of unpredictability. The continuously shifting brake pedal not only distracts but also undermines trust in the vehicle鈥攁 critical flaw when navigating winding roads where consistent braking feel is crucial.
Cabin Design and Comfort
Further diminishing the driving pleasure, the interior feels overwhelmingly enclosed. An array of screens dominate the dashboard, and the high beltline contributes to a sensation of being consumed by the vehicle itself. This claustrophobic design choice detracts from the typically luxurious and spacious feel expected of a high-end SUV.
Conclusion: A Fluke or a Forewarning?
One can only hope that the issues faced with the 2024 Mercedes-AMG EQE SUV are not indicative of future models in this line. While the potential for a powerful, luxurious electric SUV clearly exists, this particular model falls short in crucial areas that define enjoyable and reliable driving. The unsettling experience with the brake pedal, in particular, might steer enthusiasts towards more predictable and refined competitors unless significant adjustments are made.
Also read: Top Towing Suvs 2024
#11 2023 GMC Acadia
The GMC Acadia, unfortunately, finds itself on lists like the “Top 10 Worst SUVs 2024,” and for several justifiable reasons. Here鈥檚 a deeper look into why this model might not be the best choice in its segment.
Performance and Handling
One of the primary drawbacks of the GMC Acadia is its performance, which is underwhelming at best. The handling capabilities of the Acadia are considered sub-par, not offering the agility or responsiveness that drivers expect from a modern SUV. Moreover, the ride quality is harsh, detracting from the comfort and driving pleasure that should come standard in its class.
Reliability Concerns
Reliability is another major area where the Acadia falls short. Historically plagued by numerous issues, the 2017 GMC Acadia is particularly notorious, marked by problems ranging from water leaks to major transmission and electrical system failures. With three recalls focusing primarily on the powertrain and equipment, the Acadia鈥檚 reliability record could deter potential buyers.
Interior and Technology
The interior of the GMC Acadia also fails to impress. The cabin feels cramped and the seating can be uncomfortable, which is a significant downside for an SUV that should offer ample space and comfort. The infotainment system additionally suffers from being user-unfriendly, a stark contrast to the more intuitive systems found in competing models. In an era where car interiors are increasingly user-centered and technology-driven, the Acadia鈥檚 offerings feel outdated.
Design and Value
From a design perspective, the GMC Acadia does not stand out in a market that includes futuristic designs and an increasing number of electric vehicles. Its exterior looks dated, which might not appeal to those looking for a more modern aesthetic. Compounding these issues is the fact that the Acadia is one of the most expensive models in its class. Considering the numerous drawbacks, this high cost can seem unjustifiable, making the Acadia a less attractive option for discerning buyers.
Economic Considerations
From a financial standpoint, owning an Acadia could also prove costly in the long run. With average yearly maintenance costs reported at $734 and estimated maintenance costs during the first ten years reaching $7,817, it ranks as one of the more expensive SUVs to maintain.
#12 Mercedes-Benz EQS450+ SUV
One of the most critical aspects of any vehicle is how it drives, and unfortunately, the EQS SUV disappoints in this arena. The EQS 450+ version, which was supposed to showcase the potential of Mercedes-Benz in the EV landscape, instead showcases a slew of issues. The driving dynamics feel off; the brakes are unrefined and often jarring, the handling is cumbersome, and the power delivery feels artificially subdued. These elements combine to create a driving experience that is less than satisfactory, especially for a car in the luxury segment.
Range and Charging
While the EQS 450+ does boast a good range, which is a fundamental requirement for EVs, its charging capacity is only deemed decent. In the rapidly evolving world of electric vehicles, where fast charging is becoming increasingly crucial, “decent” might not be enough to compete effectively.
Design and Aesthetics
Styling is another area where the EQS SUV does not inspire. Its design is described as dull and uninspiring, making even the most basic minivans seem exciting by comparison. For a brand that prides itself on luxury and innovation, this lack of flair is a notable drawback, detracting from the overall appeal of the vehicle.
Overall Impression
Returning to a Hyundai Ioniq 5 after testing the EQS SUV speaks volumes about the Mercedes model鈥檚 performance and appeal. When a reviewer prefers a significantly less expensive vehicle over a six-figure luxury SUV, it clearly indicates profound deficiencies in the latter. This comparison not only highlights the EQS SUV’s underwhelming execution but also underscores the competitive nature of the EV market, where even established luxury brands must fight to prove their worth.
#13 Mazda CX-90
At first glance, the CX-90 makes a strong impression. It boasts a cool exterior that catches the eye, and the interior isn鈥檛 far behind, with a finish that could rival many luxury brands. When it comes to the driving experience, the CX-90 maintains Mazda鈥檚 reputation for crafting vehicles that are a pleasure to drive. This combination of stylish aesthetics and engaging performance sets a promising stage, but unfortunately, the practical aspects tell a different story.
Falling Short on Family Essentials
Despite its size, the CX-90 struggles significantly with functionality as a family SUV. The cargo area and third-row seating are surprisingly cramped, which is a major drawback for a vehicle that needs to accommodate families and all their gear. This lack of space becomes even more apparent when considering the vehicle’s overall dimensions, which promise more than they deliver.
Storage solutions within the CX-90 are also lacking. Families often look for plentiful and accessible storage for everything from toys and snacks to emergency supplies. Here, the CX-90 does not meet the needs, making it less than ideal for those with young children or pets鈥攅specially given the high-quality interior materials that are easily damaged in the rough-and-tumble reality of family life.
Ergonomic Frustrations
A particular point of contention is the design of the CX-90鈥檚 shifter, described as frustrating enough to warrant a hypothetical lifetime sentence for its designer. This type of ergonomic misstep can be a daily annoyance, detracting significantly from the overall user experience of the vehicle.
3 Comments